Tag Archives: Chappaqua Homes for Sale

Chappaqua Homes for Sale

The Time-Honored Art of Splitting Wood | Chappaqua NY Realtor

Chopping stovewood to size by hand may, at first glance, appear to be a ponderous, imprecise activity that requires little more than pure brute force. Nothing could be further from the truth, however. There is, instead, a distinct art to splitting wood. The skilled woodsman or -woman who works with — rather than against — the rounds he or she is handling can split up a lot more fuel in a given time than can some muscle-bound ox who tries to club the wood pile to smithereens. In fact, a great many experienced splitters (both chore-laden homesteaders and briefcase-laden urbanites) have honed their skills to such a point that they look upon billet-busting as one of life’s more enjoyable tasks.

The Tools

The instruments most often used for working up wood by hand are the single-blade splitting axe, a pair of three- to five-pound steel wedges, a middle-sized sledgehammer, and an eight-pound splitting maul. [EDITOR’S NOTE: Several manufacturers have devised variations on the standard hand tools — we’ve sized up a number of woodcracking aids in The Great Wood-Splitting Contest II]

However, it isn’t necessary to have all of these tools to begin work. I recommend starting out with a pair of wedges and that workhorse of the log-busting trade, the splitting maul (or “go-devil”). The blade of the latter implement can crack open many a billet, while the tool’s back end can be used for driving wedges. (By the way, never use the butt of an axe for pounding — its thin head may crack!)

The Technique

Probably the single most important wood-splitting rule is this: Always place your to-be-broken rounds on a short chopping block. Such a base will provide solid resistance to the blows, increasing your stroke’s penetration and guaranteeing that when your maul breaks through the billet, the tool’s blade will land in wood instead of slamming into dulling earth or stones.

Once you’ve set your piece of tree up on its chopping block, stand back with your arms extended and feet planted squarely apart. (And, for safety’s sake, be sure to wear boots and sturdy long pants!) Then line up the go-devil over its intended target, wind ‘er up and swing!

Now some folks go for pinpoint accuracy by lifting their mauls straight up overhead, while others feel they gain more power by swinging the implements back around their shoulders. And one person will let his or her top gripping hand slide up toward the splitter’s head on the upswing, but another will keep both hands clenched together in a grip similar to that used by a golfer. You’ll have to experiment until you decide just which technique is best for you.

Tory Burch’s Hamptons Mansion Sells at Deep Discount | Chappaqua Real Estate

Source: Wikicommons

Eleven million may sound like a lot of money, but for a South Hampton waterfront mansion, it’s spare change.

Tory Burch’s home has finally sold after a series of price cuts, and it represents a steep loss: The apparel, shoe and handbag designer bought the home in the wake of her divorce for $22.5 million.

The deeply discounted selling price not only hurts Burch, but according to the NY Post, it hasn’t made some of her neighbors too happy either. The waterfront estate is located at 2080 Meadow Ln, Southhampton, NY 11968, a prestigious area that is home to big names like David Koch, Calvin Klein, Janna Bullock and Rachael Ray.

A source told the New York Post:

Everyone in the neighborhood is staggered that she sold it at such a low price. It has sparked a lot of worry if this will affect the market and their own homes, but also a lot of speculation as to why she sold it off so cheaply.”

The home did have water damage from burst pipes, and Curbed called the home a “tear-down,” but $11 million for the property, in an area where homes sell for $30 to $50 million, still has the neighbors concerned.

7 free tech tools for brokers and agents | Chappaqua Realtor

Technology doesn’t have to be expensive or hard to use. It doesn’t have to take up space on a computer — it can reside in the cloud.

Some of the best and easiest-to-use software is free and can be found on the Internet. Any piece of technology that saves time or money or makes life easier is worth exploring, even if it isn’t used directly for selling real estate.

Here are some of my favorite free services. These apps are not just for Realtors, and have a large and sometimes very loyal user base, which is why they are continually upgraded and new features are added:

IFTTT — IFTTT is a service that lets you create powerful connections with one simple statement: If this (trigger), then that (action). IFTTT is free and it is very cool. The possibilities or recipes are endless. For example, I can set it so the action of taking a picture using Instagram triggers Evernote to create a note.

Article continues below

The site is filled with free recipes, examples and ideas, and there are 52 channels. A channel is an application like Gmail, or Evernote or Foursquare. A check-in on Foursquare could trigger a note to Evernote or a post to Blogger, or an Instagram photo could automatically be sent to Dropbox.

LastPass — I forget passwords and hate to write them down. Some of the sites I use require that I create strong passwords that I forget, and others require that I change my password on a regular basis. I gave up on remembering and tracking all of that a couple of years ago and use a free version of LastPass. One master password gets me into the “vault” where my passwords are stored, but there is so much more.

The LastPass extension is in my Web browser and I have LastPass set up to sign me into some of the websites and services I use on a regular basis. There is a mobile app, but I have found that I can use the Web browser on my phone or iPad and access my passwords that way, too. My passwords are available to me anywhere that I have Internet access.

Skitch — Skitch isn’t as great as it used to be. The last update took some features away, but I am going to go out on a limb and suggest that the features will be brought back. Skitch works on mobile phones and on computers. I use it on my phone and tablet for sketches or to draw on screen prints.

On my computer I use it for making screen shots that I can draw or type on. Very handy for bloggers and Realtors. Skitch is now part of Evernote so I can automatically store my Skitch creations in Evernote. On phones with the Android operating system, Skitch is a button built right into Evernote and a stand-alone app. There is a Skitch website where Skitch images can be posted and shared.

Google Drive — Google Drive is similar to Dropbox but not the same, and I use it differently. Google Drive is where I write and store all of my articles for Inman News. Dropbox doesn’t have a built-in word processor.

The word processing program built into Google Docs is as good as Microsoft Word (at least for my uses) and seems to be superior to anything I can find for word processing on the Macintosh. Google Drive works with Google Docs, and I can start a new document right in Google drive on any device no matter where I am. I can’t lose it because it gets saved in the cloud.

Ribbet! — When my favorite Internet-based photo editing site Picnik closed down, I was upset. I know that Picnik has been integrated into Google Plus but it isn’t a stand-alone program anymore and parts of it are missing. Ribbet! is the new Picnik. The free version is wonderful, and the premium version is amazing and free at the moment. The site is great for editing photos and for adding effects, captions and frames. Ribbet! is a wonderful tool for creating images for blog posts or for real estate marketing.

Pixlromatic — photo editing software available on mobile devices and on the Internet. There are several related products on the Pixlr site, including Pixlr, which has many if not all of the features found in Photoshop elements, and it is free. Pixlr-o-matic is fun and I can even make a poor-quality photo look artistic by applying some filters and maybe a frame. It works with pictures that have already been taken or can be used with the camera in an Android, iPhone, iPad or a webcam on a computer.

Chrome browser — advertised as a “fast free browser.” I love Chrome. It even works on computers that are so slow they make me want to cry. Chrome doesn’t slow my computer down even when I have 30 tabs opened and it never crashes. Check out the Chrome Web store and find browser add-ons for everything I mentioned in this article except IFTTT.

Vacant Homes Plague Neighbors | Chappaqua NY Homes for Sale

Deborah Jackson in front of her Chicago home.

The vacant home next to Deborah Jackson’s house has been an eyesore and magnet of blight for much longer than the Chicago homeowner would care to remember.

The roof of the empty townhouse, which is connected to Jackson’s, is shredded and caved in, causing water to leak through Jackson’s walls. Overgrown bushes and bramble peek over the property’s 4-foot fence, and possums and stray cats — instead of a nice family — live inside.

The derelict property, which has been vacant for the better part of 15 years, even appears to pose safety risks. Jackson’s granddaughter was once struck in the face by a detached piece of the home’s roof; sometimes trespassers pay unsettling visits; and the home is infested with snakes.

“Anytime I see people or have heard people, I would always call the police,” she said. “I’m looking at a jungle out here. I can’t sit on my patio. My grandkids don’t want to visit me because of the snakes.”

Unfortunately for Jackson, it’s not the only vacant property in close proximity that causes the 59-year-old schoolteacher distress. The home to her left and the two directly across the street from her in the foreclosure-ravaged South Side Chicago neighborhood of Pullman are also unoccupied.

Jackson’s story captures the heavy toll that vacant homes can take on their neighbors’ quality of life, and, at the same time, it highlights a reality that is galling to residents in hard-hit areas: Many such properties are often left to deteriorate by banks.

Foreclosure nation

The neglected yard next to Deborah Jackson’s home.

Since the housing collapse began, about 4 million Americans have lost their homes to foreclosure, resulting in a persistent glut of vacant homes on the market. Banks and other investors have managed to whittle down this supply somewhat in the past two years.

But according to online foreclosure marketplace RealtyTrac, there are still about 532,000 homes in the possession of banks or government-sponsored investors, and most of them are vacant and not listed. In addition, many of the 950,000 homes that RealtyTrac says are not yet repossessed, but still in some stage of foreclosure, have already been vacated.

The spotlight is usually on the economic impact of vacant homes: their tendency to drag down prices by selling at steep discounts and bloating housing supply. But sometimes less explored are the intangible effects of the empty properties on neighboring homeowners.

Magnets of blight and crime

Ed Jacob, executive director of Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, said vacant homes can burden neighbors — some of whom are teetering on the brink of foreclosure themselves — and even put them in harm’s way.

Snakes and other pests have infested the yard of the abandoned home.

“They become magnets of crime. They’ll get stripped of all their copper,” Jacob said of the vacant properties. “People use them to stash their drugs. It’s a huge psychological effect on homeowners who are hanging on.”

Jackson is no stranger to this phenomenon. Thieves looted a neighboring abandoned property to her left — a different home than the one that’s infested with snakes. Authorities later told her that there was a danger of a gas explosion happening at the home because the burglars had removed the furnace.

“They took everything that wasn’t nailed down,” she said.

Vacant properties can cast such a dark cloud over their communities that, when those homes are finally purchased, it’s sometimes cause for celebration.

Ihsan Atta of Brookfield, WI, recalled living next to a vacant home for months that was teeming with rodents and had overgrown bushes. People living in the neighborhood had become so put off by the decrepit property that when an investment firm snapped it up recently, neighbors rejoiced.

“One neighbor went by— I thought she was so happy, she was going to kiss me,” said Marty Boardman, chief financial officer of Rising Sun Capital Group, the home investor that bought the property.

Are banks to blame?

The blight of vacant properties is often the fault of the financial institutions that own or oversee them. Those financial institutions — whether it be banks or government-backed organizations such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration — sometimes fail to keep up on the properties’ maintenance.

“Often that means that the lawn’s not being mowed and maintenance isn’t being done on the property, and so it’s just going to be an eyesore in the neighborhood,” said Daren Blomquist, vice president of  RealtyTrac.

Financial institutions sometimes turn a blind eye to vacant properties in their portfolios because they either don’t want to pay or can’t afford maintenance costs, experts say.

Labeling some financial institutions “slumlords,” consumer advocates and local governments have tried to hold their feet to the fire.

The City of Los Angeles brought a lawsuit against Deutsche Bank and U.S. Bancorp for allegedly failing to maintain some of their repossessed properties. Also, the National Fair Housing Alliance filed complaints with the Department of Housing and Urban Development against U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo for allegedly neglecting repossessed properties concentrated in minority neighborhoods.

If financial institutions sold foreclosures quickly, such properties would have less of a chance to grind on neighborhoods. But according to RealtyTrac, a repossessed property takes an average of 195 days to sell. And that’s after the average 378 days that a home takes to be repossessed by a bank, a period during which the home may be vacated by its former resident.

“Banks don’t know how to sell houses. They’re not very good at it,” said Boardman, whose company flips 30 to 50 homes a year. He pointed to a recent deal in which, he said, it took Chase two months to find an employee who actually had the authority to approve a sale.

‘My hands are kind of tied’

Jackson said that she recently convinced the Chicago Department of Streets and Sanitation to clear debris out of the snake-infested backyard of the abandoned property that abuts her home, a job that she said took three hours for 11 men to complete.

Ideally, either a bank or the city will repossess the home and rehabilitate it. Public records suggest that the home has not been repossessed yet, according to RealtyTrac. But that’s out of Jackson’s hands.

Meanwhile, she’s tried to contact banks tasked with caring for some of the other four vacant homes neighboring her so she can nudge them into tending to the properties. But that’s proved impossible so far.

Two of the vacant homes — much like 80 percent of all repossessed properties in the U.S., by RealtyTrac’s measure — are not listed, so she can’t identify their owners.

She said only one of the four vacant homes surrounding her has a for-sale sign, but no one has answered calls from her or her neighbors when they have dialed the phone number on it.

She’s also tried to determine the other properties’ owners by searching public records, but she has been unable to identify some of the deed-holders and unable to reach the others.

Many concerned neighbors, as well as capable buyers, have hit the same roadblocks, experts say. Bureaucratic ineptitude, profit-driven asset-management strategies and the overall complexity of a securities market where mortgages once traded hands like hot potatoes are all to blame.

Despite the challenges, Jackson said that she is determined to reach the owners of the blighted homes that have tainted her neighborhood for years.

“But right now my hands are kind of tied,” she said.

Debate leaves some taxing questions about housing unresolved | Chappaqua Realtor

Mitt Romney and Barack Obama images via MittRomney.com and WhiteHouse.govMitt Romney and Barack Obama images via MittRomney.com and WhiteHouse.gov

Anybody who watched it knows that Mitt Romney scored a technical knockout of President Obama in last week’s debate. But are there some potential future costs and concerns for housing that have to be looked at in the wake of that victory?

On the one hand, Romney surprised Obama with sharp criticism over an issue that has plagued homebuyers and refinancers: the super-strict underwriting and documentation that banks are requiring for home loans, in part because they’re worried about forthcoming “qualified mortgage” federal rules under the Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation.

“It’s been two years,” Romney said to Obama at the Denver debate, “We (still) don’t know what a ‘qualified mortgage’ is. So banks are reluctant to make mortgages … It’s hurting the housing market.”

There’s no question that regulators have proceeded at a frustratingly glacial pace since the passage of Dodd-Frank in July of 2010, and we don’t know what the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will come out with on this issue in early 2013.

Will the bureau, which took over the project from the Federal Reserve in mid-2011, create a straightforward “safe harbor” for lenders — a set of basic bright lines defining an applicant’s “ability to pay” within which banks can originate loans without fear of litigation every time a borrower goes seriously delinquent?

Or will regulators instead open the door to nitpicking, costly lawsuits and thereby make lenders even more gun-shy about originating new mortgages?

The wrong answers could wreck mortgage lending for years to come.

Obama had no response to Romney’s critical shot on qualified mortgages and maybe wasn’t even aware of the problem. In fact, it’s possible even Romney hadn’t heard much about it until the previous week, when his team was briefed by David H. Stevens, CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association, who’s also the former FHA Commissioner and former head of Long and Foster Realtors.

Qualified mortgage (QM) was a well-prepared debate zinger, and put the spotlight on an undeniable failing of this administration: lackluster response times to urgent housing needs, plus unworkable regulatory proposals that have delayed needed guidance on mortgages even longer. (Remember “QRM” — the proposed mandatory 20 percent down payment plan? It’s still nowhere to be seen.)

But Romney’s good stuff on qualified mortgages was not the most important matter involving real estate that came up in the debate. Romney’s tax plan — the one that Obama charged repeatedly would add trillions to the deficit — never was addressed in terms of its specific potential impacts on homeowners.

Romney never said the words “mortgage interest deduction” during the debate, but the MID, along with most other longstanding and popular write-offs, is at the core of his tax reform concept.

In order to pay for the estimated $4.8 trillion in tax revenue reductions he proposes — starting with a 20 percent across-the-board cut in tax rates, elimination of the alternative minimum tax, the estate tax and other revenue-losing measures — Romney needs to eliminate or downsize trillions in tax deductions, credits and subsidies. That’s how his plan is supposed to achieve revenue neutrality, i.e., it wouldn’t raise the deficit.

Two days before the debate, he told Denver TV station KDVR that he’s open to limiting the MID along with a long list of other write-offs as part of an overall reform of the tax code.

“As an option,” Romney told his interviewer, “you could say everybody’s going to get up to a $17,000 deduction. And you could use your charitable, home mortgage deduction or others — your health care deduction, and you can fill that bucket, if you will, that $17,000 bucket, that way.”

Earlier this year, at a private fundraising meeting, Romney told supporters that among other options on taxes, he would consider eliminating the mortgage interest deduction for second homes outright.

Tax reform proponents, such as the bipartisan, nonprofit Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, praised Romney’s concept of capping or eliminating popular write-offs as “very significant and progressive” following the debate. “Progressive” in tax lingo means: It siphons off more money from higher-income taxpayers than it does from lower- and middle-income folks.

The committee noted that just 30 percent of all U.S. taxpayers itemize at all, yet “almost all higher earners currently itemize more than $17,000 in deductions.” In fact, the committee added, the average itemizer in 2011 wrote off $26,000, and the top 1 percent of earners wrote off an average $174,000.

Absent additional details about the tax reform plans from Romney, large numbers of homeowners would be forced to choose which write-offs went into their capped deduction “buckets.” Do we take deductions for the mortgage interest we paid, or do we write off what we donated to charities?

During the debate, Romney said he was open to higher numbers on caps, but that all of this would have to be worked out in negotiations with Congress after he took office. Hmmmm.

Make no mistake: When it comes to housing-related write-offs, we are talking big, big numbers that could solve a multitude of revenue-raising problems.

According to the Joint Congressional Committee on Taxation’s latest projections, the home mortgage interest deduction will save homeowners — and cost the federal Treasury — nearly half a trillion dollars ($484 billion) during fiscal years 2010-2015. Local real estate tax deductions for homeowners will save owners — and cost the government — about $121 billion. The capital gains exclusion for home sales alone comes in at $86 billion.

Though the main housing lobbies have been quiet about Romney’s tax plans — preferring to wait for more details — the fact remains: For the first time in years, we have a Republican presidential candidate who is willing to put some of housing’s most sacrosanct tax code preferences on the cutting block. Obama talks about limiting MID write-offs for people who make $250,000 or more. Romney is talking about much bigger limitations.

Sure, it’s campaign rhetoric, and sure, the deduction cutbacks have to be seen in the context of significant reductions in tax brackets that would lower taxes elsewhere. But the crucial question is: What would this all do to housing values, sales, building and homeownership?

We could really use some details.