Tag Archives: Bedford Hills NY Homes for Sale

Bedford Hills NY Homes for Sale

Bedford Hills NY Real Estate | Jobless claims shoot back up to 388,000 filings

After a week of positive employment data, jobless claims shot back up for the week ending Oct. 13, derailing confidence in the economic recovery.

The Labor Department reported 388,000 jobless claims for the week, an increase of 46,000 filings from the prior week’s revised figure of 342,000.

The four-week moving average hit 365,500, which is higher than the 364,750 level established a week prior.

Seasonal adjustments in California contributed to the quick jump in claims, Econoday researchers said Thursday. The jump was expected at the beginning of the quarter, but came in the second week of the period, the research firm said.

“This is a major factor behind violent swings in weekly jobless claims, up 46,000 in the October 13 week after dropping a revised 27,000 in the prior week,” Econoday said. “Swings like this, which weekly data are subject to, put in focus the four-week average which is only slightly higher, up less than 1,000 to 365,500.”

The news disrupts a few weeks of moderately optimistic reports with the unemployment rate falling to 7.8% in September as nonfarm payrolls rose by 114,000 positions, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Mobile-friendly sites turn visitors into customers | Bedford Hills Real Estate

The following post originally appeared on the Google Mobile Ads Blog.

In this world of constant connectivity, consumers expect to find the information that they want, when they want it – especially when they’re on the go. We know that this applies to their web browsing experiences on mobile, so we took a deeper look at users’ expectations and reactions towards their site experiences on mobile. Most interestingly, 61% of people said that they’d quickly move onto another site if they didn’t find what they were looking for right away on a mobile site. The bottom line: Without a mobile-friendly site you’ll be driving users to your competition. In fact, 67% of users are more likely to buy from a mobile-friendly site, so if that site’s not yours, you’ll be missing out in a big way.

Discover these and more findings from, What Users Want Most From Mobile Sites Today, a study from Google (conducted by Sterling Research and SmithGeiger, independent market research firms). The report surveyed 1,088 US adult smartphone Internet users in July 2012.
The problem (and opportunity) is big…
While nearly 75% of users prefer a mobile-friendly site, 96% of consumers say they’ve encountered sites that were clearly not designed for mobile devices. This is both a big problem and a big opportunity for companies seeking to engage with mobile users.
Mobile-friendly sites turn users into customers
The fastest path to mobile customers is through a mobile-friendly site. If your site offers a great mobile experience, users are more likely to make a purchase.
  • When they visited a mobile-friendly site, 74% of people say they’re more likely to return to that site in the future
  • 67% of mobile users say that when they visit a mobile-friendly site, they’re more likely to buy a site’s product or service
Not having a mobile-friendly site helps your competitors
A great mobile site experience is becoming increasingly important, and users will keep looking for a mobile-friendly site until they find one that works for them. That means your competitors will benefit if your site falls down on the job (and vice versa).
  • 61% of users said that if they didn’t find what they were looking for right away on a mobile site, they’d quickly move on to another site
  • 79% of people who don’t like what they find on one site will go back and search for another site
  • 50% of people said that even if they like a business, they will use them less often if the website isn’t mobile-friendly
Non-mobile friendly sites can hurt a company’s reputation
It turns out that you can lose more than the sale with a bad mobile experience. A site that’s not designed for mobile can leave users feeling downright frustrated, and these negative reactions translate directly to the brands themselves.
  • 48% of users say they feel frustrated and annoyed when they get to a site that’s not mobile-friendly
  • 36% said they felt like they’ve wasted their time by visiting those sites
  • 52% of users said that a bad mobile experience made them less likely to engage with a company
  • 48% said that if a site didn’t work well on their smartphones, it made them feel like the company didn’t care about their business
Takeaways
While the research confirms what we already suspected — that mobile users actively seek out and prefer to engage with mobile-friendly sites — it’s a sobering reminder of just how quickly and deeply users attitudes about companies can be shaped by mobile site experiences. Having a great mobile site is no longer just about making a few more sales. It’s become a critical component of building strong brands, nurturing lasting customer relationships, and making mobile work for you.
To learn more about our study
  • Click here and join our free webinar on September 26 at 1 p.m. EST  / 10 a.m. PST
  • Get help on building a mobile-friendly site, visit howtogomo.com.
Posted by: Masha Fisch, Google Mobile Ads Marketing

Realtors fault low appraisals for sluggish housing market | Bedford Hills NY Homes

When Justin Olson put his Southwest-style ranch house outside Phoenix on the market, he got what he was expecting: an immediate batch of offers, virtually all above his asking price, which was set intentionally low to attract interest at $197,500. He chose an offer of $210,000.

But then came an unpleasant surprise. An appraiser for the buyer’s bank said the house was worth only $195,000. That limited the amount that the bank would lend, forcing the buyer to come up with more cash or negotiate a lower price.

“There was just no way I was selling that house for less than $200,000,” Olson said. His broker, Brett Barry of Homesmart, advised him that there was little chance of changing the appraiser’s mind. Olson said, “The part that blows me away — the appraisal can be such an arbitrary, personal decision and there is no appeals process.”

Adding to his indignation, a similar house two doors away was appraised and sold for $225,000.

Appraisals are generally ordered by banks so they can verify the value of collateral before granting a mortgage. Before the housing crash, when home values seemed only to rise, appraisals were almost an afterthought.

But now, with banks far more cautious about lending, a low appraisal can torpedo a deal.

The problem is so widespread that this week the National Association of Realtors blamed faulty appraisals for holding back the housing recovery, saying its members had reported that more than a third of all deals were canceled, delayed or renegotiated to a lower price because of a low appraisal. Several real estate agents said they were starting to include appraisal contingencies in their contracts, spelling out how much a buyer would be willing to pay in cash if the appraisal fell short.

Appraisers use previous sales of comparable houses to help value a home. If prices are just starting to climb, and sales take two or three months to close, there can be a lag before the change in prices is observed.

The Realtors report said appraisers were improperly using foreclosures and neglected properties as comparable homes, failing to account for market conditions like scarce inventory and bidding wars, and working in areas where they lack local expertise. The report faulted banks for using inexperienced appraisers and for creating unrealistic requirements, like six comparable sales instead of three, at a time of few sales.

“It’s holding sellers off the market,” said Jed Smith, the managing director of quantitative research for the Realtors group. “Sales volume could probably be an additional 10 to 15 percent higher if we had normal lending practices and if we had normal appraisal practices.” That in turn, he said, would create more jobs.

Appraisers and real estate brokers agreed that a ban, imposed since the housing crash, on loan originators’ handpicking appraisers had led to the use of appraisal management companies that take a healthy cut of the consumer’s fee and hire inexperienced, low-cost appraisers.

But appraisers took issue with the complaints and pointed out that unlike real estate agents, they have no bias or incentive to help complete a deal.

“Appraisers don’t set the market; they reflect what’s happening in the market,” said Ken Chitester, a spokesman for the Appraisal Institute, a professional association. “So don’t shoot the messenger. Blaming the appraiser for a bad housing market is like blaming the weatherman because you don’t like the weather.”

Olson and his buyer compromised on a price of $205,000, less than initially offered and therefore, some might say, less than the house was worth.

But any transaction involving a mortgage is limited by the appraisal — an assessment that is part science, part art and is based on a variety of factors like location and square footage.

Though Olson’s house was in good condition, the house nearby that sold for more had at least $30,000 worth of upgrades, said Craig Young, the broker who represented the seller. But Young said appraisals could still be unpredictable, pointing out that a home across the street sold for even more, $239,000.

Some appraisers said agents misunderstand the way homes are valued. For example, although bank-owned homes generally sell at a discount, that is not true in every neighborhood, said Dan McKinnon, who runs an appraisal company with his wife in Phoenix. Appraisers, therefore, do not automatically make adjustments if they are using such sales for comparison. Some bank-owned homes are in good condition, and in some neighborhoods bank-owned sales dominate the market and thus determine prices.

“If that property is in similar condition to your subject, it is direct competition,” McKinnon said.

Must-knows before secretly recording your tenants | Bedford Hills NY Real Estate

Q: One of my tenants wants to meet with me to go over some issues we’re having with him. He has complained that we are discriminating against him, and has threatened to file a complaint. I think he’s just trying to get some money out of us, and I want to record the conversation so that I have evidence of his thinly veiled threats in case I need it. Is there anything illegal about recording our meeting? –Dustin J.

A: There’s no legal problem at all in recording your conversation with your tenant as long as you tell the tenant, at the outset, that your recording device will be switched on. If your tenant doesn’t want to be recorded, he can simply leave the meeting. If he agrees, the recording can be shown to your lawyer and any lawyer or fair housing agency contacted by the tenant, and could conceivably be introduced as evidence in court.

But are you asking whether you can secretly record the meeting? The answer to this one is quite different. Many states, including California, Connecticut, Illinois and Georgia, do not allow a party to a conversation to intentionally record it without all participants’ permission.

In California, for example, the violation is a criminal offense (a misdemeanor), and it exposes the perpetrator to civil damages as well. (Calif. Penal Code sections 632 and 637.2.) But importantly, in order for the recording to be illegal, the conversation must have taken place in a place and manner that gave rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy on the part of the person being recorded.

For example, a loud argument at the community pool, which is recorded by someone’s cell phone (not necessarily by one of the speakers), probably would not be a violation of the law, because no one could reasonably expect that the conversation would be confidential. Not so if the meeting takes place behind closed doors, with only the two speakers present.

You’ll need to find out whether your state prohibits secret recordings. If it does, do not proceed. Doing so is a crime, although it’s not too likely that a prosecuting attorney will be interested in prosecuting a single offense.

Many times, however, people record conversations and then later tell their lawyers about the recording. A lawyer might be able to use the recording in court in a very limited circumstance: If the other side testifies under oath in a way that’s inconsistent with statements made on the recording, a judge might allow the recording into evidence to discredit, or impeach, the witness’s testimony. Some states have decided that it’s more important to expose a liar than to uphold their state’s rule against secret recording.

Q: A family applied for a two-bedroom apartment. Because the family included a teenage boy and girl, I thought that the place was too small for them, because the kids would each need a bedroom. The family told us that the kids don’t mind sharing a room, but it seems wrong to me. Can I reject them without risking a fair housing complaint? –Larry L.

A: You may mean well, but your conclusions about what is proper or not will not legally support your position. The federal Fair Housing Act prohibits landlords from discriminating against applicants and tenants on the basis of their “familial status.” Among other things, this means that the landlord cannot make decisions about how families should allocate bedrooms (not only are family sleeping arrangements none of their business, but all too often, landlords make this issue a pretext for turning families away). As long as the space meets minimum size requirements for a sleeping room, as established by your state building codes, it’s none of the landlord’s business who bunks with whom.

A family that thinks you are making decisions based on the age and sex of their children may consider calling the local HUD (Department of Housing and Urban Development) office. They can file a complaint online. HUD will investigate the matter (or have an equivalent state agency do it for them), and if there’s a basis for their complaint, they’ll attempt to settle the case. If that goes nowhere, it will go before a judge, who has the ability to compensate the tenants, order you to offer the rental, order you to attend fair housing education classes, and more.

U.S. Mortgage Fraud Initiative Data Included Older Cases | Bedford Hills NY Real Estate

The announcement from the Obama administration was that a yearlong crackdown on mortgage fraud netted charges against 530 suspects in the year ending Sept. 30.

In fact, the list included cases filed as many as two years before U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said the initiative began.

Holder said at a news conference in Washington yesterday that the initiative ran from Oct. 1, 2011 to Sept. 30, 2012 and resulted in “285 federal criminal indictments and informations against 530 defendants for allegedly victimizing more than 73,000 American homeowners — and inflicting losses in excess of $1 billion.”

A sampling of cases incorporated in the data Holder cited shows those numbers include cases filed as early as 2009.

Cases filed before the start of the initiative were included because some type of “law enforcement action” occurred during the yearlong period, according to William Carter, a spokesman for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Those actions could include indictments, convictions and sentencings, he said.

“There is no attempt to fudge the numbers or make it look like it was a bigger problem than it was,” Carter said. “Through our intelligence, we saw this as a rising problem and we’re trying to get ahead of it.”

The “Distressed Homeowner Initiative” was spearheaded by the FBI, which began to recognize a sharp increase in frauds aimed at struggling homeowners in the years following of the 2008 housing crisis, Kevin Perkins, the FBI’s associate deputy director, said at yesterday’s news conference.

FBI Survey

The information used to compile the results from the initiative came from an FBI survey of the agencies involved in the Mortgage Fraud Working Group.

The Justice Department didn’t provide a list of the 285 cases. Of 11 cases touted by individual U.S. attorney offices as being part of the initiative, six were filed in 2009 and 2010. Another two were filed before October 1, 2011, the date cited by Holder as the start of the fraud crackdown.

One fraudulent loan case against operators of a mortgage brokerage, an attorney and legal staffer was filed in Trenton, New Jersey, on July 20, 2009.

Charges against one of the defendants in the case were dismissed two years ago. Four others pleaded guilty this year to assorted charges including wire-fraud conspiracy and tax evasion. Another defendant was convicted at trial in March of conspiracy and money laundering.

In a case involving falsified loan documents in Washington, the defendant pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge about two weeks before the initiative began. She was sentenced to 40 months in prison in January.

Politics Denied

Holder said yesterday that the timing of the announcement, less than a month from the 2012 presidential election, had nothing to do with politics.

“The notion that this is a campaign event — I mean, there’s a logical break,” Holder said. “This thing started with the fiscal year last year and ends with the fiscal year September 30. So we’re now reporting on what happened over the past fiscal year. That’s what this is all about.”

Adora Andy, a spokeswoman for the Justice Department, didn’t respond to e-mail and telephone requests for comment.

The press conference yesterday was meant to draw attention to the issue that has become a growing problem on the FBI’s radar, Carter said.

“We want to get the word out to the public that these fraudsters are out there,” he said.

Desperate Targeted

The FBI also released a public service announcement with Tim DeKay, an actor from the television series “White Collar,” warning about fraud schemes “that target Americans desperate to modify loans and avoid mortgage foreclosures.”

In 2010, fewer than four percent of the FBI’s mortgage fraud cases involved distressed homeowner fraud, Perkins said at the press conference. This year that number has risen to 20 percent.

As President Barack Obama’s administration rolled out plans aimed at increasing mortgage modifications to keep people in their homes, the number of fraud schemes targeting those same homeowners began to increase, Shaun Donovan, the Housing and Urban Development Department secretary, said yesterday at the press conference.

Typical schemes involved promises to homeowners that foreclosures could be prevented by payment of a fee. As part of the scams, “investors” purchase the mortgage or the titles of homes are transferred to those taking part in the fraud, resulting in homeowners losing their property.

7 musts for maintaining a redwood deck | Bedford Hills Realtor

Q: My redwood deck is about 2 years old and needs a good cleaning. Which product would you recommend to clean a redwood deck and what sealant should I use? I like a clear, natural finish.

A: You’re right at the outside edge there. If a redwood deck gets a fair amount of sun, it should be cleaned and resealed at least every second year. If it’s mainly shaded and you haven’t developed mildew, you can get by with doing it every three years. Cleaning and sealing should be viewed as a regular maintenance program and will prolong the life of the deck as well as maintain its look.

Although we’ve addressed this subject many times, a quick refresher course is in order.

For longevity and aesthetics, apply a preservative to outdoor wood. It can either be semitransparent stain or clear preservative. While stain will change the color of the wood, a clear preservative will darken and enrich its natural color. An example is redwood, which is a light red, almost pinkish color in its freshly milled state but turns to a deep red rose when treated with most preservatives.

Article continues below

Many companies make sealants and stains for outdoor wood. Some of the better-known brands are Cabot, TWP, Defy and Armstrong. For a clear finish, our favorite has always been DuckBack’s Superdeck, a sealer that offers protection from the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays. But we recommend you do your own research by going to deckstainhelp.com and clicking on “product reviews.”

Frequency of sealing depends on exposure to weather and use. A maintenance program consists of cleaning the deck, removing any mildew, and applying a new coat of preservative.

Although we continue to believe that the best way to clean a deck is with a pressure washer, a stiff-bristle brush and plenty of elbow grease will do the job, especially if cleaning is done regularly. Think about going to the dentist to have your teeth cleaned. The job is a lot easier and less painful if it’s done at regular intervals.

A pressure washer sends out a pressurized fan of water that makes short work of surface dirt, mold and mildew. These machines are available at rental centers and can be purchased at home centers. If you get along well with your neighbors, consider getting two or three of them to chip in on buying one and then sharing it.

We recommend using a pressure washer that can produce a stream of water of at least 1,500 pounds per square inch (psi). Be sure to keep the wand moving so you don’t blast softer wood away from the surface and leave a rippled effect on the deck. Deck cleaners formulated for use with pressure washers are available where the machines are rented or sold.

If you go the brush route, use a stiff-bristle brush and deck cleaner mixed in a bucket of water in the proportions the manufacturer recommends. Use a brush attached to a broom handle to save wear and tear on the back and knees.

In shaded, moist areas, mildew can be a problem. Wash with a weak bleach solution — 1/4 cup of bleach to a gallon of water — to kill the fungus before pressure washing or scrubbing.

Once cleaning is completed, thoroughly rinse the deck with clear water and allow the deck to dry for several days. Then brush, roll or spray a coat of UV protective water-repellent sealer or stain. We found some excellent “how to” videos on the Superdeck website.

So, to sum up:

  • Pressure wash your deck rather than sanding it.
  • Clean and treat your deck with a preservative every two years.
  • Remove any mildew by pressure washing thoroughly.
  • Use a pressure washer with at least 1,500 psi.
  • Use the fan setting on the nozzle and keep it moving to prevent a ripple effect.
  • Use a chemical deck cleaner for really bad decks.
  • Apply sealer or stain.

Chase mortgage profits swell on HARP, slower buybacks | Bedford Hills NY Homes

JPMorgan Chase ($36.07 2.03%) reported higher profits from its mortgage business due mostly to a major government refinancing program and slower repurchases.

The bank reported $604 million in profits from mortgage origination and servicing during the second quarter, compared to a $649 million loss in the year-ago period.

Including repurchase losses, revenue on its mortgage production line grew 62% from the year-ago quarter to $1.6 billion. Chase said it saw more gains from its involvement in the Home Affordable Refinancing Program.

The bank originated $43.9 billion in new home loans in the second quarter, up 29% from one year ago. Its retail channel netted a record $26.1 billion in new originations.

Its liability for repurchases dropped $216 million to less than $3.3 billion as of March 31, according to its financial filing. Chase also narrowed losses in the quarter to roughly $10 million from buying back faulty mortgages from investors.

“The net repurchase number should be approximately zero for the next quarter,” said Chief Financial Officer Doug Braunstein. “The real difference is our cure rates. As these demands go deeper into the securities they’re taking more mortgages that have been paying longer, and we’re decreasing the amount of demands.”

Unresolved repurchase requests from the government-sponsored enterprises dropped to $1.6 billion.

Braunstein added the bank saw “a modest increase” in demands from private-label securities investors.

“Much of that will make its way through litigation,” Braunstein said.